Information package — everything you told us
82/100
Most fields are present, but several high-value facts are still owner claims or uploaded documents awaiting independent verification.
Cloud LandAnonymized example
A site in Oklahoma
This sample shows what a Livio Cloud land evaluation looks like without exposing owner names, coordinates, county, rivers, landmarks, client names, or private transaction details.
The report separates the full information package score from the verified score. Livio can discuss terms early, but terms stay pending to closing until open items are closed with trusted evidence.
What independent records confirm so far
41/100
Verified score counts only public-record, title, utility, issuer-confirmed, or other trusted-system evidence.
Owner journey
Corroboration
The file can continue, but binding site-control artifacts remain conditioned on the open items below.
Terms pending to closing
Open items shown before any final terms.
Open items
- Utility-confirmed POI, network-upgrade responsibility, and energization date.
- Owner-of-record confirmation through title or public record.
- ALTA survey or recorded plat confirming usable acreage.
- Phase I ESA or authorization for Livio to order it.
What speeds closing
- Upload executed agreements rather than screenshots or summaries.
- Use issuer, title, utility, assessor, or surveyor records where possible.
- Make broker authority explicit before Livio spends diligence time.
- Keep payment instructions inside verified escrow channels only.
Your parcel next
Want this read on your site?
Start the guided intake — first pass in hours. County and state plus a power story is enough to begin.